« Goode Company Barbecue is your Houston restaurant mustJim Nantz's Hootie pandering hurts Masters, makes him golf's worst announcer »


Comment from: June [Visitor]
Lame, pathetic, childish, BS, paranoic, Psychotic...

I am running out of adjectives to describe your mental condition of you, Baldy.
2006-04-13 @ 07:06
Comment from: June [Visitor]
You just made it inot the list for "the quote of the century".

Baldy said "For once, I really don't have a problem with Michelle Wie. "

Can anybody really believe this?

Oh, as for your remark of her being eseentially 0 for 33 events, you are more likely 0 for 33 years or more.

Good grief, Baldy, when and where your obsession of Michelle will end?

You may thought that you will enjoy high traffic with this Wie-bashing but sooner or later you will drive away all the visiters from this site with your sour, bad, fould-taste remarks on a girl.
2006-04-13 @ 07:12
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
You're so predictable--
I posted that you would write something about Michelle Wie regarding the 60 minutes interview back on Saturday.

2006-04-13 @ 07:22
Comment from: Cranston [Visitor]
For a guy with a hate on for Michelle Wie, Chris seems to invest a lot of time writing about her, watching her, commenting on her legs, etc.

If any other adult male spent this much time fawning over a 16yo girl, it'd be called something between stalking and pedophilia.

Since travelgolf.com puts this blog on, I assume that they condone the hateful, mysogynistic attitudes. I wonder if they think this is some way to allow open and free dialogue? I wonder if they spend this much careful thought on their travel offerings. It sure isn't what I'd look for in a service provider.
2006-04-13 @ 07:23
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
I saw that interview on Sunday, and
Steve Kroft did not ask her

" You think you look ugly ?" with Michelle answering "Only in the morning"

That interview is still on my Tivo and I watched it again to make sure, and that question was definitely not asked on Sunday's telecast.

You just proved you didn't watch it and now you're talking out of your ass...

Is it too much to ask for you to get your facts straight--no wonder you're loser ass is getting sued.
2006-04-13 @ 07:27
Comment from: Al [Visitor]
with everything you say about a teenage girl who can simply kick your it would explain alot knowing you were gay
2006-04-13 @ 07:27
Comment from: Steve [Visitor]
The garbage that comes out of the baldy's mouth--tisk, tisk. We all feel sorry for you and hope that you can some day grow out of spewing vile for a living.
2006-04-13 @ 08:49
Comment from: Joe [Visitor]
I think your comments are appropriate and I do not understand the overly negative comments from the people above. Both the Tiger interview and the Wie interview were below the standards of 60 Minutes. Both were puff pieces with nothing new or interesting. It is well known that the Tiger people placed boundaries on Ed Bradley. No info yet on the Wie machine rules for interviews. I guess 60 Minutes has sold out for ratings. No integrity left at 60 Minutes. It is CBS so no real surprise I guess.
2006-04-13 @ 09:19
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
Those Michelle quotes were not in the interview--Baldwin made them up.
You can even check out the transcript from the CBS News website if you don't believe me. I double checked it already from my TiVo and those words he quoted above were definitely not said.

60 minutes is one of the highest rated shows on TV-it shows how dumb Baldwin is if he think he can lie about something millions of people saw.

You think someone that goes after a
16 year old girl with inaccurate facts and such vitriol has integrity?

I hear from some Las Vegas friends--he's even getting sued for defamation.
2006-04-13 @ 09:36
Comment from: Hoyt Decker [Visitor]
Check your meds, Kyle. Baldwin links to the video in his last paragraph. It's fine to dislike Chris and his opinion about Michelle Wie, but your paranoia is really troubling.
2006-04-13 @ 10:05
Comment from: JoAnne Lusk [Visitor]
OK Chris, enough. I think she has been hyped, but look what
she has accomplished at 16. She chose a different route.... this is the USA--she's got a lot on the ball. She sure has accomplished a lot more at 16 than 99.9% of the population!
Find something real to bash.
2006-04-13 @ 10:42
Comment from: ToddCommish [Visitor]
60 Minutes hasn't been relevant for years. They're now simply a caricature of television journalism. Did you really expect them to grill Wie like she was the kingpin of a tobacco firm?
2006-04-13 @ 12:25
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

Chill out Hoyt--its called an opinion.
Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean you're paranoid.

By the way why don't you Google "Chris Baldwin" and defamation lawsuit and see what comes up...
2006-04-13 @ 13:58
Comment from: putt4par [Visitor]
CBS is like travelgolf.com, totally irrelevant in any sense of the word Jouranlism.
And Chris Bladwins `Journalist' stalking of a teenage girl shows how far the media has gone in the loss of morals.
Go get a life, Chris.
And while you are at it, just hope that no journalist ever decides to take the same kind of run at a child of yours.
2006-04-13 @ 14:01
Comment from: Chris Baldwin [Member] Email
Kyle, even your fellow blogger posters are calling you out. Yes, that ugly question is in the video that I linked to on the 60 Minutes site. Your TiVo apparently works as well as your brain.

But nice try there, buddy.

Once again, leave the Wie defenses to the real Wie Warriors.
2006-04-13 @ 14:12
Comment from: Ann [Visitor]
For someone who claims to not be a fan of Michelle Wie, I'm surprised that you even watch and are commenting about Wie's interview on "60 Minutes." Maybe, just maybe, you might be a closeted Wie fan to watch her on something that is not relevant to her performance in the game.

I'm surprised. But, then again, people can surprise you sometimes.
2006-04-13 @ 15:02
Comment from: Tim [Visitor]
Chris, have you considered the irony of writing 133 articles about how Michelle Wie gets too much attention?
2006-04-13 @ 15:10
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
Those questions you brought up in your blog were NOT included in the Sunday telecast and you implied that they were.

Your quotes from above were exclusives from the CBS website and not on the show Sunday night.

Of course there's no way you would know since you didn't watch the show from Sunday night.

2006-04-13 @ 15:14
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

So you lied yet again Baldwin--

How did you see
those questions asked of Michelle Wie Sunday night when those clips from the CBS website weren't available until Tuesday morning?

My TiVo works just fine --Thank you.
2006-04-13 @ 15:18
Comment from: Chris Baldwin [Member] Email
Actually, Kyle. Those clips were up promoting the show Sunday as well. It's the same interview. Kroft didn't sit down with her twice at age 16. That's part of the 60 Minute interview.

The only thing you've "exposed" is your petty obsession.

Come with some facts man. Like Michelle Wie being 0 for 33. Baldwin being 0 for ... oh, that's right my Wie predictions have been all right.

Sorry there. But thanks keeping for the comments rolling.
2006-04-13 @ 15:44
Comment from: Jacob [Visitor]
Chris Baldwin's obsession with Michelle Wie is well documented, his need to criticize her every move rightly or wrongly is a bit much, but behavior such as Kyle's is equally, if not more over the top. Kyle one could ask you the same questions you seem to ask Mr. Baldwin all the time. Why do you care so much? What is your obsession with Ms. Wie? Your, frankly creepy defense of her and attacks on Chris are psychotic sounding.
2006-04-13 @ 16:01
Comment from: william [Visitor]
Do Chris Baldy and Tim McDonald have the same biological father? These dorks tirelessly criticize this 16 year old girl for all the publicity she gets, while at the same time promulgating the media frenzy themselves. If you do a google search on these two idiots, they are the ones who are actually leading the charge in flooding the internet with flimsy and superficial articles about Wie.
2006-04-13 @ 16:23
Comment from: mike [Visitor]
Too funny that Baldwin and Joe think that 60 minutes has so recently sold out. Where were they 2 years ago when they originally started the interview?

"Wie's first feature appearance two years ago helped 60 Minutes win the prestigious Gracie Award for Outstanding News Magazine."

Of course Baldwin wouldn't know anything about awards when it comes to journalism. What a joke.

2006-04-13 @ 16:59
Comment from: Jay [Visitor]
I just don't get it. How can Baldwin have a grudge against such a sweet girl ? The only thing she did 'wrong' is get 10 million dollar endorsements.

Baldwin should change his photo on this web. Draw two horns, goatee, and hold a three pronged sword.
2006-04-13 @ 21:47
Comment from: Jason [Visitor]

Alright now, this is beyond pathetic...

You truly need to get a life.

It must be sad that you have made such little contribution to your life and career that you have been reduced to writing ridiculous blogs just so people will read them. Why don't you quit picking on a 16 year old girl, and do something productive with your writing.

Everything you write (not only about Michelle) has been strictly amateurish and without merit.

Did you even go to journalism school? If you did what do your colleagues think about you being a 3rd rate blogger so desperate for attention and validation. I also saw that it is true you are currently being sued for defamation for one of your previous articles -your career is truly sad.

2006-04-13 @ 22:35
Comment from: Fred [Visitor]
Chrissy Baldwin, still at it. Take your Midol and chill out.
2006-04-14 @ 00:23
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Chris Baldwin takes on the role of Devil's Advocate and you Wie Warriors take the bait hook, line, and sinker. You folks rail at him for his prejudice and lack of objectivity, but your adulation of Miss Wie, her overbearing stage father, and her entourage blind you to your own lack of objectivity. Several Wie admirers actually think that Miss Wie will win on the PGA tour. One diehard insisted that this miracle will happen within two years. Do you guys call that being realistic? You're good at saying that the skies the limit for your pet, that she has many remarkable accomplishments, that she will surely re-write the history of women's golf, and on and on. But when Chris or anyone else reminds you people that Miss Wie is 0 for 33, you have the tired reply that "she is only 16" and "how can you pick on such a sweet girl?" and "how would you like it if someone said such things about your daughter?" and other such rubbish. You guys can't have it both ways. She is a PRO! She has been a "de facto" pro for about three years. She hasn't won anything. Accept these facts and you might be on the way to recovery.
2006-04-14 @ 09:20
Comment from: June [Visitor]
Alex, has she been a pro "de facto" for 3 years because she din't play on Amateur events or because she played on LPGA 5 or 6 times a year?

If the latter is the case, Morgan has been a pro since 2005 (0 for 10 or so)and Puala has been a pro for about 2 and a half years (2 for 30 or so).

Think about that?

0 for 33? Ridiculous argument!!!
2006-04-14 @ 11:21
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Neither Morgan Pressel nor Paula Creamer is the subject of this thread. Neither of these young ladies is being promoted as being capable of re-writing the history of women's golf. Neither Morgan nor Paula has been badgering tour promoters to get sponsors' exemptions on the PGA tour. Very little is being written or broadcast about either of these young ladies. All of the above have been promoted for Michelle by Wie's legions. On the other hand, Morgan has won the US Women's Amateur and made it through the "Q" school, and Paula led the "Q" school and has won two LPGA events and two others worldwide. Miss Wie is still, however, WINLESS.0 for 33. Ask Chris.
2006-04-14 @ 12:57
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
Hey alex

Where did Paula and Morgan finish at the two events Michelle played in as well this year?

The Wie's have not badgered anyone for an exemption the sponsors have given it to them willingly.

And can't you defend your points by yourself?
Why do we have to "Ask Chris"
2006-04-14 @ 13:29
Comment from: Jim COULTHARD [Visitor]
Actually by these standards Morgan Pressel has been a de facto pro since she played in the 2001 Open shortly after she turned 13. Asn far as her US Women's Amateur win is concerned--it doesn't count since since she was a de facto pro who should not even have been allowed to compete.
2006-04-14 @ 13:45
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Uh, guys, please pay attention. This blog is not, I repeat, IS NOT about Morgan or Paula. Miss Wie is the subject that Chris has put under scrutiny. He thinks that the "60 minutes" interview was nothing more than a set-up of softball questions. What do you think?Remember gentlemen, the subject of this blog is Michelle Wie. The relative merits of the play of Morgan Pressel and/or Paula Creamer are irrelevant on this thread. Chris Baldwin, please clue these guys in. Thank you.
2006-04-14 @ 15:25
Comment from: Johnny N. [Visitor]
Comment from Alex:
Neither Morgan nor Paula has been badgering tour promoters to get sponsors' exemptions on the PGA tour.

Neither has Michelle. In fact, several pga tournaments have offered her exemptions, including a few for this year, but she has turned down many. For instance she turned down the John Deere, the year before she entered it. Also, she has been offered some events for this summer, but she can take her pick.

So Alex, please get your facts straight. Michelle Wie does not badger pga tournaments for sponsorship exemptions, in fact they want her and she can pick and choose.
2006-04-14 @ 15:42
Comment from: Johnny N. [Visitor]
Comment from: Alex
Uh, guys, please pay attention. This blog is not, I repeat, IS NOT about Morgan or Paula. Miss Wie is the subject that Chris has put under scrutiny.
Remember gentlemen, the subject of this blog is Michelle Wie. The relative merits of the play of Morgan Pressel and/or Paula Creamer are irrelevant on this thread.

Alex, if you believe this then why did you also state the following:

On the other hand, Morgan has won the US Women's Amateur and made it through the "Q" school, and Paula led the "Q" school and has won two LPGA events and two others worldwide.

That was you discussing those other two golfers, in the very same thread.
As for Q school, Michelle hasn't been there, and she has performed so well that she won't have to even bother with Q school, she will qualify the automatic way, by winning enough money, just like Tiger Woods did on the pga tour.
2006-04-14 @ 15:45
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

You're the first one here to bring up Paula and Morgan--uh pay attention....
2006-04-14 @ 16:07
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
Michelle Wie is Supergirl from tee to green. Putting is her Kryptonite.

Michelle tied for 1st in greens in regulation (GIR) at the Fields Open and was the leader in GIR at the Kraft. So how did anyone beat her?

Her are the stats comparing Karrie (the winner) to Michelle:


Michelle was 1st

Karrie was tied for 9th

Putts Per Round:

Karrie was tied for 5th with an average of 28.25 PPR.

Michelle was tied for 65th place with an average of 31.75 PPR.

Michelle gave up three and a half strokes per round to Karrie on the greens. Michelle can't give up fourteen strokes per match and expect to win.
2006-04-14 @ 18:16
Comment from: Liam [Visitor]
Kyle, June was the actually the first to mention Morgan and Paula. Kyle, why are you so angry? Is it because you know that Alex is right? It's always the same thing with Wie fans, she's the best, she's going to dominate the LPGA, she hits the ball so far, she will eventually win on the PGA tour, etc, etc...The problem is that she is not dominating, in fact she is not even winning yet. I know, I know she is only 16 1/2 years old and nobody has ever won at that age, but here's the thing, she's not like everybody according to her fans, Nike, IMG, and most of the media. The tales of her prowess have been crammed down our throats for years now and she has not delivered, let's face facts she has had the ability and game to win on the women's tour for years and she has not. I know it makes you angry when people bring this up, but the truth is she has had chances to win and has not. Being tall and moderately attractive does not make you a legend, winning golf tournaments does. I have said my peace. I will now prepare for the inevitable child molester comments from Michelle's obviously sane fanbase.
2006-04-14 @ 22:37
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
I can't see why anyone would object to comparing the teenage golfers playing on the LPGA tour and their game. What I object to is when the comments go beyond their game to how they look or the shape of their legs.

These are young ladies who deserve some respect for their individual accomplishements in the world of golf.

2006-04-14 @ 23:10
Comment from: Brian [Visitor]

What's bothering you? The fact that Wie lost her chance to win? Or the fact that she didn't get punished for not winning?

Many people who posted on this blog don't care whether Wie is 0 for 32 or not, except for Chris and Wie haters.

Many people on this blog are not bothered by the fact that Wie is getting $10 million a year without winning, except for Chris and Wie haters.

In other word, many people on this blog are pointing out that Chris' obsessions with Wie are too much.

2006-04-15 @ 00:45
Comment from: Judge Smails [Visitor]
Chris is right again. Bubbles is the embodiment of style over substance.
2006-04-15 @ 00:45
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
"Comment from: Judge Smells [Visitor]
Chris is right again. Bubbles is the embodiment of style over substance."

I often wonder how golf experts are created from a group of Slugs that would not make the cut at an LPGA event. They can talk a good game but that is where their golf expertise ends. Kind of like golf writers.
2006-04-15 @ 01:36
Comment from: Dandy Dan [Visitor]
What is Michelle supposed to do when asked if she thinks she's ugly? Lie? I didn't see that question on 60 Minutes (liar, liar pants on fire), but if she did say it, then it was a witty comeback to a baited question.
2006-04-15 @ 04:13
Comment from: David [Visitor]
The golf is starting to get in the way, and now Michelle is failing at school.
2006-04-15 @ 06:53
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

Are you for real ??

I think the angry one here is the person that keeps putting the same person down every chance he can get for no reason at all.

Check out your posts--you sound a lot angrier than most people in this blog.

Why don't you and Baldwin, Alex and the other Wie haters get some balls and direct your insecurities at something else?

2006-04-15 @ 07:47
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Kyle, If you re-read all of my posts, you'll find that I never expressed any "hate" for Miss Wie. I did state that I expect her to win more than a few times on the LPGA tour. I did say that she has a chance, albeit a slim one, to make a cut eventually on the PGA tour. But apparently that isn't enough for you folks who absolutely adore Miss Wie's every move. How much of that Wie koolaid does one have to drink to become a true believer? It seems to me that many of you guys have OD'd on it.
2006-04-15 @ 08:27
Comment from: marko [Visitor]
"Winless Wonder"??? I believe this is a bit off if not much too early to be making this kind of specious name tagging on a 16-year old girl. Remember she is not even playing on the LPGA full time. The only thing she's doing full time is being a student in high school as Baldwin must have the intelligence to know.

BTW it's funny that losers [Baldy this is you] who has never won anything of import when he was 16 could make such a stupid and hypocritical statement like this about a nice girl.

We all know that you are profiting by attacking a teenager--this is the number one article in Google search news section and this jerk is being paid by Google. Only losers in the most pathetic sense would week-by-week profit from Wie-bashing.

Good luck in your life, you'll need it.
2006-04-15 @ 11:47
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
marko, We hear you loud and clear. Twice in your post you told us that Michelle is 16 years old. Also that she is a "nice girl", a "teenager", and a fulltime high school student. What you didn't say is that she has gotten more favorable publicity than any other teenager in history and that thus far she hasn't lived up to the hype. If you see nothing wrong with Miss Wie making millions with no effort, you should extend the same courtesy to Chris Baldwin who wants to earn a farthing or two by exposing Michelle for the creation of marketing that she is.
2006-04-15 @ 13:40
Comment from: marko [Visitor]
Alex, Alex... You actually sound like Balwin defending himself.

We live in a capitalist society--hello??? Why don't you Alex and Baldy just go live in a communist country if you are just so stuck up on this whole marketing thing.

Most Americans do not think it's such a bad thing to market a talented teenager who is making a positive contribution to not only women's golf but is also a great role model for kids. There are so many people who do absolutely nothing for society but are filthy rich.

I'm glad you get my point loud and clear Alex because people like you just don't seem to get this simple idea through your thick skull--she is 16 and she will be playing a lot more golf in the years to come to prove herself. The intelligent thing to do would be to wait a few more years before jumping to conclusions, something that you must do a lot in your life.

BTW, you are utterly insane if you think she has done nothing.

2006-04-15 @ 14:50
Comment from: David [Visitor]
But Marko, that's the problem.

She isn't a full-time student at high school - she's never there. I even remember a guy from Hawaii post on this blog who happened to attend the same high school as Michelle, and he actually stated that it is a rare sight to see Michelle in school.

Michelle has already failed her SATs, AND she hasn't won anything yet. The only thing that is looking good for her at the moment is her bank balance.

2006-04-15 @ 14:51
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]


You and Baldwin must be relying on the same sources--

Yes Michelle did bad on her SAT which she admitted to--but she also said she didn't study for it at all-she took it without any reviewing. How do you know she failed? She may not have gotten the score she wanted but that doesn't mean she failed.

What are you talking about that she is failing school? Every feature that has been done on her has intimated that she is an A student at her high school.

You and Baldwin act like those catty Hilton sisters...
2006-04-15 @ 15:28
Comment from: Jimmy [Visitor]
Failed SAT? What was her score?
2006-04-15 @ 16:59
Comment from: mike [Visitor]
"But Marko, that's the problem. She isn't a full-time student at high school - she's never there. I even remember a guy from Hawaii post on this blog who happened to attend the same high school as Michelle, and he actually stated that it is a rare sight to see Michelle in school. Michelle has already failed her SATs, AND she hasn't won anything yet. The only thing that is looking good for her at the moment is her bank balance. " BS I see her everyday. She was back in classes the day after the Kraft. "Failed"? How do you fail an SAT? Not show up? You guys live in a dream world.
2006-04-15 @ 17:46
Comment from: theory [Visitor]
shock and awe as Chris Baldwin is discovered as a hardcore Michelle fan who wanted to make people come defend her, possibly becoming a fan in the process.
2006-04-15 @ 20:24
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
That was a good one: "Michelle has already failed her SATs".

She is a Junior and can take the test again if needed in her Senior year to improve her score.
2006-04-16 @ 01:10
Comment from: Bo McDowell [Visitor]
Hello Chris,

It just hit me reading your article that you seem to be watching and reading anything and everything about Michelle Wie. I didn't even know that she was appearing in the 60 Minutes. It takes a great devotion to do that.

Have you ever wondered youself why you spend so much time and energy discussing her ? Hatred is a twin whose other sibling is love. Admit it Chris, you like her.

2006-04-16 @ 03:35
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
marko, Believe it or not, I finally got your message. I now realize that Miss Wie is ONLY 16 YEARS OLD! And in October she'll be only 17! Gotcha! And I now know that this is a capitalist country and there is nothing wrong with making as much money as possible as long as no laws are broken. So tell me, marko, why doesn't that same right extend to Baldwin who is trying to turn a buck exposing Miss Wie? Another thing, marko, please try to be civil. Forget the epithets like "thick skull" and "utterly insane." Your posts are far from perfect and your lack of punctuation is irritating, but I'd be the last to insult you over it.
2006-04-16 @ 08:15
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
The Wie Warriors are not shy about predicting that their idol will perform all sorts of miracles. She will re-write the history of women's golf, win several women's majors sooner than anyone else in history, even that she will win a PGA tour event within the next two years, which would be much earlier than any man has ever won such an event. marko, even says that she is an excellent role model for young children (at age 16?) and a budding philanthropist. Then marko changes his tack and says, in a delicious bit of irony, that we Wie sceptics should "wait a few more years before jumping to conclusions." Don't you just love it? A Wie Warrior giving advice about being cautious!
2006-04-16 @ 09:02
Comment from: putt4par [Visitor]
So tell us Alex, how do you really feel about Michelle Wie?
2006-04-16 @ 11:54
Comment from: David [Visitor]
Hell, I don't know how the SAT works. I'm British. But a test that is impossible to fail just seems pretty pointless to me.

By the way, an A student studies for exams. Stop making excuses for Michelle; she got lazy, didn't study, and cocked up her exams.
2006-04-16 @ 12:07
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

Alex and David sound like those ranting paranoid schizo's walking around the streets of any major city...

Alex-- "Expose Michelle Wie" ??
Is she hiding something about herself we don't know about? Something only you and your fellow pod people know ?

Expose her of what ??--she's been upfront with everything she's wanted to do--and its not her fault insecure cowards like you have a problem with her goals.

David - -how do you know she cocked up her exams ? You don't even know what an SAT is, you've never been at her school and you're making crazy unfounded declarations about her grades. She's an A-student and making millions-get some self-esteem and live with it.
You make even less sense than Alex and that is really hard to do.
2006-04-16 @ 12:54
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
"Comment from: David [Visitor]
Hell, I don't know how the SAT works. I'm British. But a test that is impossible to fail just seems pretty pointless to me.

By the way, an A student studies for exams. Stop making excuses for Michelle; she got lazy, didn't study, and cocked up her exams."

A prime example of ignorant "Wie Haters" everywhere. They tend to invent controversy from their lack of understanding of anything including the game of golf.

Most of these so called golf experts couldn't pull together a sub-par round from the Junior tees with the wind at their back all day long.

Hey Alex I see your Worldwide recruiting efforts have paid off with your latest member of the Wie Haters from the UK.

God Save the Queen.
2006-04-16 @ 15:01
Comment from: marko [Visitor]
Alex, you need to lighten up a little get off net for a while. It seems I've touched an nerve or two of an insecurity. Alright, I'll stop the ad hominems, they may have be a tad disrepectful. My apologies Alex, but you don't deserve any to be honest. Wie-bashing or bashing anyone for that matter who doesn't deserve it will not be a cause for much glowing agreement to your cause. Just lay off the girl for chrissake, don't you have anything better to do in your life? Is being a troll that satisfying? If it is then good for you, and enjoy the dysfunctionality you social outcast. But please, I say this without sarcasim, there really is no need to get so worked up on a message board like this.
2006-04-16 @ 17:51
Comment from: Jim COULTHARD [Visitor]
The SAT is supposed to be a test you cannot study for. Unfortunately for Michelle Wie there is a very strong correlation between math skill and SAT performance--even on the verbal part of the test, to say nothing of the math part. Since math sounds like the academic area where Michelle Wie has the most difficulty, it is not surprising that her SATs may have been lower than she hoped. Working hard in school to get A's in math does not get you the high SAT scores that someone who is just a natural in math would get.

EXAMPLE. A girl is 3/8 of the way through a tunnel when she hears a train coming. She could run back and reach the start of the tunnel when the train does, or run forward and reach the end when the train does. If the train goes 60mph how fast does the girl run? A MATH NATURAL CAN DO THIS PROBLEM MENTALLY.
She runs 3/8 of the tunnel to get to the start when the train does, or she runs 3/8 of the tunnel to get
3/8 + 3/8 = 3/4 of the way through when the train reaches the start. In the latter case she runs trhough the remaining 1/4 of the tunnel in the time it takes the train to go through the entire tunnel so she runs
1/4 of 60mph = 15mph.

People who are able to think like this do much better on the SAT than people who have not yet learned to think in this way. Unfortunately we rarely teach people to think about math in this fashion at least in the US. Perhaps our UK friends could tell us if this type of reasoning is common in England.
2006-04-16 @ 19:02
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
marko, Don't take this criticism as anything but constructive. In my opinion, you should post your internet prose in your native language, whatever it might be. Your last post made it clear that English is not your strong suit. Or at least try your spell check. Most of what you post has become unintelligible.
2006-04-16 @ 20:10
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
putt4par, I feel about Miss Wie as I would about any teen-age prodigy. She has a tremendous amount of talent and she should be a force on the Ladies' tour for a long time, barring anything unforeseen. I think she has been hyped far too much, and that she might never live up to the unrealistic expectations her father, her handlers, and her fans have thrust on her. As far as her ever being a force on the PGA tour, as they say in Brooklyn, "fuhget about it!"
2006-04-16 @ 20:21
Comment from: Jim COULTHARD [Visitor]
If everybody hates lawyers, I think Alex's comments to Marko can at least help us to understand why that might be the case.
I, for one, would certainly advise Marko to take your comments as anything but constructive.
Perhaps Alex should use grammar check. One does not usually start a sentence with a proper noun that is uncapitalized, only to follow it with a capitalized "Don't".
2006-04-16 @ 22:48
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
Henry VI (Part 2) the play by William Shakespeare

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers". - (Act IV, Scene II).

"Small things make base men proud". - (Act IV, Scene I).

At least there is one Limey I can understand and agree with.
2006-04-17 @ 03:29
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Jim C, Kindly be aware that my friend marko starts his handle with a lower case "m". I defer to the spelling and case letter that the poster himself uses. Jim, you don't really want to get into a discussion and critique regarding grammar and spelling on internet blogs, do you? Not you, of all people!
2006-04-17 @ 09:59
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
One-Putt, Jim C is now a member of the internet grammar police. He says that one should never end a sentence with a preposition. I agree with him.:-)
2006-04-17 @ 10:11
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
One-Putt, I've got a question for you. Now that Jim C has divulged the fact that Michelle's math skills are as suspect as her putting, will you reconsider your opinion that Miss Wie will someday earn a Master's degree in Business Administration? Just asking.
2006-04-17 @ 14:41
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
Hey Alex, Jim lost me with the math problem. I'm still stuck in the tunnel running away from the damned train.

Shame on me once again, I thought this was a golf Blog and never realized I signed up for online classes.
2006-04-17 @ 14:43
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
"Comment from: Alex [Visitor] · http://Alex
One-Putt, I've got a question for you. Now that Jim C has divulged the fact that Michelle's math skills are as suspect as her putting, will you reconsider your opinion that Miss Wie will someday earn a Master's degree in Business Administration? Just asking."

Only if you accept the fact I said, "perhaps later".

I agree completely with you on one point Alex, Michelle must do her homework on putting if she hopes to graduate to the next level.

2006-04-17 @ 15:16
Comment from: Jose Chung [Visitor]
Although I have no interest in golf, I enjoyed both of the golfer profiles on 60 Minutes.

What a surprise that Bill Clinton even cheated on his golf score, when he played Miss Wie!

Well, at least he didn't grope her.
2006-04-17 @ 16:15
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
One-Putt, I thought the punch line of the math problem was going to be "What was the maiden name of the engineer's maternal grandmother?"
2006-04-17 @ 17:29
Comment from: John Neal [Visitor]

I thought you, being of the legal profession, would most certainly have addressed the key issues of the question:

Why was a young girl running inside a tunnel?

Did the publisher of the test footnote the question with a warning that this was a hazardous activity that the test taker should not personally attempt?

Is there not grounds for a lucrative class-action suit here?

Do I know anyone whose child might have been needlessly endangered by this patently dangerous and irresponsible question?
2006-04-17 @ 22:27
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
John Neal, Civil tort law is not my field of endeavor. My opinion is that the railroad in this case would not be culpable. Attempting to walk or run through a tunnel with a train bearing down at 60 mph is prima facie a reckless act. However, Jim C might bear some blame in case of a castrophy since he didn't offer a disclaimer on his hypothesis.
2006-04-18 @ 07:34
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
edit: catastrophy
2006-04-18 @ 14:48
Comment from: putt4par [Visitor]
My my, Alex, I can certainly believe you are a lawyer.
You sit in your pearly little tower and set everyone up with your derogatory and inflamatory prose and then whip the responders for reacting exactly as you hoped they would.

Having said that, I am still of the firm opinion that you an Chris Baldwin are idiots. Very glib idiots, but idiots all the same.

Quite frankly I don't give a darn whether Ms. Wie ever wins, she is an entertaining young golfer.

Now, you and Chris seem to have a problem with the hype. Well, let Baldwin stop publshing this sort of incendiary nonsense and half the hype would vanish. Then you could go the rest of the route and take Nike, Sony, et al. to task for their sponsorship of Ms.Wie. I'm sure that they would take you very seriosly.

Next, why not take your alleged legal talents and find a way to stop BJ Wie from exploiting his daughter. That is after all one of the favourite battle cries of the Wie Bashers, right?

So she is a Pro. And you sit there in your rarified air and tell us that because she is a pro, that being 16 years old and a pro suddenly makes her incapable of 16 year old mistakes and 16 year old mannerisms?
Really, Alex, take a good look around you. I mean take a responsible look around you and then give us page ad verse of all the totally un-teenage like 16 year olds you see, no matter if they are "pro or not.
As I said before, I don't care whether she wins or not, what I really object to in all this BS that Baldwin spews forth, is the totally irrisponsible and unfair misinformation he keeps writing in these blogs.

I said it before and I'll say it again, Baldwin would really blow his cool if any papparazi style reporter set up a blog such as this and started a word war on one of his children. I am also sure that you would be very quick to find way to stop anyone from making the same sort of blog about one of your kids, Alex.

Just stop being such a blathering dupe in Baldwins war of words against MW. Go fight the really perpetrators of the hype machine. Go talk to Omega and Nike and Sony. I can just imagine the reception you'd get.
2006-04-18 @ 17:09
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
putt4par, When you go on a long, windy, wordy rant like you did in your last post, and then have the gonads to say someone else is glib and an idiot, you prove just two things. One, you have more nerve than the guy that ate the first oyster, and two, you are stupid enough to be twins.:-)
2006-04-18 @ 21:13
Comment from: putt4par [Visitor]
Hit a nerve , did I? Don't like it when someone else gives you a bad time? Get used to it, you imbecile.
2006-04-18 @ 21:37
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
WOW! I can't wait for the SK Telecom Open to see the comments it produces.

Hey Guys we are blogging here and everyone says what is on their mind. What good does it do to use venom?
2006-04-19 @ 02:33
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Hey putt4par, haven't you noticed any of the humor in my recenr post? Even the smiley faces? After what I've been through in my life, nothing anyone writes on an internet blog will ever strike a nerve with me or any person with the sense God gave a goose. One-Putt is right. Venom does no good. For your information, I'm about as far from being an imbecile as one can get. And your not dumb,either. Maybe just a bit misguided. Too much bangers and mash, perhaps, washed down with Watney's? Again,:-)
2006-04-19 @ 08:00
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
2006-04-19 @ 08:03
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
putt4par, earlier in this thread, you asked me what I really thought of Miss Wie. I answered that I believed that she was a teenage prodigy, that in my opinion she had a wealth of talent, and that she should be a force on that women's tour for a long time. I further stated that she would never be successful on the PGA tour. What do you find so egregious about those opinions? I think I know what has gotten your dander up. Your countryman, fellow Brit David had the gall to reveal that darling Michelle had gone into the tank on her SAT's. She may be the only person of Oriental heritage extant who is not proficient at Math. In PC lingo, she is arithmetically challenged. her public speaking is also nondescript.
2006-04-19 @ 09:50
Comment from: putt4par [Visitor]
Really? My fellow Brit? What ever gave you the understanding that I am a Brit?
Again you assume. As a lawyer??? you should know better.

And what were here SAT scores? They have not been published to my knowledge, so how do you know what they are? She said she didn't do well.
Her opinion.

Comment from: Alex [Visitor] · http://Alex
Hey putt4par, haven't you noticed any of the humor in my recenr post? Even the smiley faces?

Humor? Really? ok, if you say so.

Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]

Hey Guys we are blogging here and everyone says what is on their mind. What good does it do to use venom?

Yeah, Alex loves the venom and he does love to bait people with it.

I really shouldn't respond but he can be such and ass... Part of his assume mode I suspect.

And if you really want to talk venom, then go back and read Chris Baldwins complete works in these blogs. Or Alex' responses although I suspect he nay just be a Chris Baldwin clone.
2006-04-19 @ 11:15
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
Alex writes "She may be the only person of Oriental heritage extant who is not proficient at Math"

Actually Michelle Wie is Asian and not Oriental--she's not a rug --and not all Asian people are good at math.

Alex--you keep on digging a deeper hole for yourself there. Everyone already thinks you're an emasculated idiot but a racist as well ?
Wow-you're a winner- your family must be so proud.
2006-04-19 @ 11:51
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

Anyone think its odd that a self-proclaimed golf aficionado like Alex only replies to blogs by Chris Baldwin...
kind of makes you think they're the same person.
Alex is probably thinking how he's going to defend himself but of course he has to
"Ask Chris" first....
2006-04-19 @ 11:55
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Hey fellows, and I use the last term advisedly, you're really reading too much into my posts. You know, Miss Wie's father is reportedly a college professor. I have no reason to doubt that assertion. He is also a Korean, either by birth or ethnicity. It is well established that people of Korean ancestry are top-notch achievers, and that they encourage their offspring to be similar achievers. For this reason, it was undoubtedly quite difficult for BJ Wie to put Michelle on the path that he has chosen. But since she is obviously arithmetically challenged, and her chances of becoming a Nobel Prize winner in literature are slim and none, BJ, being possesed of that other Korean virtue known as pragmatism, shrugged and decided that his only child should excel at the sport of golf. And to no one's surprise, she's doing quite well at the trade that has been chosen for her. Now, if she would only win something, her fans night be able to contain their seething hatred at her detractors and go absolutely bat shit crazy with glee.
2006-04-19 @ 15:31
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Kyle, I have one question: Is it possible for anyone to be as clueless as you are pretending to be? If you would be so kind as to look up the meaning of the word "Oriental", you would find that it means originating or being native to the "East", which was at the time in the eastern direction from Europe. China, India, Japan, Korea, etc., were and are still all parts of the Orient. All of Asia is Oriental. Miss Wie is absolutely not Asian at all. She is a natural-born US citizen. She certainly is of Oriental heritage. Kyle, your history lesson is over. We may have testing on the aforementioned material at a later date.
2006-04-19 @ 15:47
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

You're the clueless one--you don't even know that you don't call people Oriental.

Do you even know any Asian people?
Why don't you ask them if they like being called "Oriental"

Since you're so busy holed up in your trailer waiting for the rest of the pod people to contact you -I doubt you will get an opportunity to ask.

You've already shown your ignorance but its kind of funny the way you defend your lack of knowledge. You're a human Jerry Springer show.
2006-04-19 @ 15:55
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
The world according to Kyle: "You're clueless, no, you're clueless, no you're...". Brilliant repartee, Kyle. Young man, when and if you grow out of adolescence, you'll realize when you are out-classed. There is nothing wrong with being patently ignorant of most things; on the other hand, there isn't that much that's good about it either.You,young fella, are proof of both hypotheses.
2006-04-19 @ 17:30
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]
I believe I only called you clueless once but its not my fault you have an IQ of 30.

Don't even try to debate me son, because you will get owned each time.
2006-04-19 @ 20:08
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Kyle, I felt pretty confident in my ability to debate UNTIL your latest blog. Then I said "Oh no! Kyle is wise to me! He has my number! All is lost!" Tomorrow I will tender my resignation. I will offer my share in the firm for sale at an extreme discount. I will bow in deference to the omniscient Kyle. Kyle is, after all, the consummate debater. He must be; he admits it. I tell you, it doesn't get any better than this. Where else can a guy get this kind of entertainment for such a reasonable price? Keep it coming Kyle, I love it!
2006-04-19 @ 20:51
Comment from: One-Putt [Visitor]
Does this mean you submited your resume to BJ and will soon become a member of the Wie team Alex? I discovered she is looking for a legal advocate to protect her growing empire and someone who will tutor her in math.

2006-04-20 @ 07:19
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
One-Putt, I thought of contacting BJ but then I realized that they would probably be searching for someone much younger than me, someone with fire in his belly, possibly like Kyle. As far as tutoring her in math, Kyle could probably do it since he has had recent success at his own SAT's. He also would do well in tutoring the verbal part although the written part might be a little shaky.
2006-04-20 @ 07:44
Comment from: Kyle [Visitor]

2006-04-20 @ 15:24
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Kyle, you may be bored, but face , you can't wait to read these words of wisdom.
2006-04-20 @ 19:04
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
edit: face it
2006-04-20 @ 19:07
Comment from: DCgirl [Visitor]
Alex - I'm an Asian-American (I was born in the U.S. but my parents were born in Taiwan). Kyle is right about the use of the term Oriental. I usually hear it from old law partners (80 and older) or from people from small towns who have never met an Asian.
2006-04-24 @ 17:58
Comment from: dayton [Visitor]
kyle is right, hoyt is wrong. the quote about being ugly is on the link hoyt provides, which is an extra web clip and NOT on the 60 minutes broadcast.

which all proves that the Chris is a genius who writes reviews for shows he's not seen.

not sure which makes you the more relevant blogger... being deceptive and making up a quote or being sloppy and lazy and confusing a TV broadcast with something on the internet

either way. I salute you! you are an important guy thx google
2006-05-05 @ 17:19
Comment from: tommy [Visitor] Email
hi to all fo you !!!
2006-11-28 @ 08:51

Comments are closed for this post.

Petoskey Golf Packages
Dates: January 18, 2018 - December 31, 2018
The Unlimited Golf Getaway package is perfect for the serious golfer that wants to pack in the rounds! The unlimited package provides you unlimited golfing access to five of BOYNE's outstanding golf courses and a night's stay.
Price range: $139