![]() |
|
||
Oscar farce: A world where Peter O'Toole can't win a big one any easier than Michelle Wie is out of whack
Monday February 26, 2007 | 04:30:22 243 words, 6784 views
In their infinite wisdom, the folks at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences elected to deny Peter O’Toole an Oscar for the eighth time. Which makes about as much sense as most of the lame acceptance speeches. Robbing one of the greatest actors of all time of one of those golden statues that everyone wanted to put on the floor this year is the equivalent of giving Michelle Wie a sports lifetime achievement award. Peter O’Toole is nearly the Tiger Woods of acting and he gets treated like a two-bit journeyman by his voting peers. Plus, O’Toole is damn funny. If you ever caught the 74-year-old on Letterman, you know the guy has crazy story game. Well into his later years, O’Toole acted about as young as your average frat boy while looking even older than TravelGolf.com’s own Tim McDonald. He freely - and proudly - admits he spent the bulk of his career drunk (O’Toole, not McDonald). Who can’t get behind a drunk Irishman? Apparently, a lot of dumb Academy voters. Come on, the guy’s 74. How many chances do you think he has left? Peter O’Toole doesn’t have an Oscar. Geoff Ogilvy has a major. Now that’s a crazy world. Of course if O’Toole could earn it himself like you do in sports, there would be no problem. Speaking of that, perhaps Michelle Wie will consider a career change. Hollywood and the land of it not earning it, here she comes!
Comments:
You are the first of what hopefully will be many columns reflecting the disappointment of us all. The academy is often confusing, but in my eyes never more so than last night not giving up the gold to Peter. If for nothing else, they should have considered what an amazing acceptance speech it would have been, polished and perfect and full charisma, the speech itself would have been nominated next year.
Comment from: Kiel Christianson [Member]
I think Forrest Whittaker was deserving.
This said, O'Toole has been deserving for decades. Let's hope he gets a Lifetime Achievement Oscar next year. BTW, Chris, just how many drunk Irishmen have you been behind? (Sorry--couldn't resist!)
Great skill in working Michelle Wie into the story.
Comment from: Shanks [Member]
Somebody, please wake up Kiel. O'Toole already got his Lifetime Achievement Oscar in 2003. IMHO, had he not gotten that already, it is likely he would've won this year.
Anyone who didn't know that Forrest
Whittaker was a lock does not understand the politics of modern America. O'Toole had no chance, and he knew it.
Comment from: Kiel Christianson [Member]
Thanks, Shanks! I had completely forgotten
that! And good point, at that.
The Academy has never been the free-thinking group they wish they were, nor have they ever stuck their neck out for O'Toole. Only in 2003, when facing an absolute wrestle, did they consent to make up for their misdeeds by giving him a lifetime achievement award. That's sort of like getting the Miss Congeniality award after you've lost for the top post multiple times.
When O'Toole clearly deserved top honors for "Lion In Winter," they decided that his depiction on some dead old English king who they didn't know about, they gave it to American Actor Cliff Robertson, who portrayed a simpleton who got smart and then went back to being retarded in the movie, "Charly." Clearly, they never have relished roles of subtletly. No, they are lemmings. As predictable as the next awards show. Leave a comment: |
My Latest posts
Check it out!
Misc |
|||||||||
| Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site | |
| © Copyright 1997-2009, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us! |
|