TravelGolf.com
- Updated Daily |
Golf Search
-
Course ReviewsCourse GuideResort FeaturesTravel FeaturesGolf InstructionGolf PackagersReader Forums
The Daily Blog Archives
Chris Baldwin   Chris Baldwin
   a TravelGolf.com Blog
-
Blog Home | The Daily Blog | Worldwide Golf Blogs | Free Golf Podcasts

Carolyn Bivens' problem: Pathetic lack of TV coverage allows Tiger Woods to completely overshadow Women's British Open

Saturday August 4, 2007 | 21:14:39 309 words, 3263 views
Win a free golf book!

All that talk about women’s golf drawing a lot of buzz needs to stop now. It holds about as much water as Lindsay Lohan’s the cocaine wasn’t mine defense.

For the TV coverage of the Women’s British Open proves without a doubt that the decision makers that matter still regard women’s golf as a third-rate sport at best.

You get more comprehensive coverage of hot dog eating contests and spelling bees in the U.S.

Lorena Ochoa, the No. 1-ranked player in the world in desperate need of a signature victory, holds the six-shot lead she needs at historic St. Andrews and you’ll be able to see two hours total of the final round this afternoon.

In fact, the entire TV coverage of the Women’s British Open totals about seven and 1/2 hours over four rounds. That’s less than just the final day coverage of the Men’s British Open. Heck, Arena Football routinely gets more time.

Is it any wonder why Tiger Woods at Firestone is completely overshadowing the Women’s British Open? Sure Tiger can draw attention away from anything. But it surely helps that most of his shots are actually on TV.

Watch SportsCenter and you’d be sure that Firestone is the major while the Women’s British Open is a podunk event more in line with a local rodeo.

This is LPGA Tour commissioner Carolyn Bivens’ major problem. Bivens does not have control over the British Open, it’s not an LPGA-run event. But that’s no excuse. A supposed marketing maven should be able to finesse her players getting more respect and exposure.

It’s not like the Women’s British Open is unique either. The TV coverage of most of the women’s tournaments is pathetic.

Ochoa should have her coronation today. But does a major title count if no one can watch it?

Maybe Ochoa will wish she played poker instead.


Comments:

Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
You get two? We get 1.5. Remember the old days (1980s) of the British Open for Men (new name of the event...like it?), when they got little coverage? Well, the women have to work for it, as you imply. Unfortunately for them, their Tiger-In-Waiting was derailed, and they'll have to search high and low to find a replacement female to carry the tour. Maybe they'll take the group approach, since women are much better at creating community than men.
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 07:51
Comment from: Dave Marrandette [Member] Email
Excellent point, Chris. It's beginning to look like Bivens has never done any marketing at all.
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 07:58
Comment from: Judge Smails [Visitor] Email
When are you people going to get it? Not that many people are interested in their third-rate tour; it's as simple as that. Women's golf is just a bit like Barack Obama, in that to some extent it's a media creation; the only difference is that Obama is more marketable and the media are far more interested in buttressing his fortunes.

You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Ever hear of the Colorado Silver Bullets?
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 10:23
$$$$$$$$$

If they'd get the viewers, they'd get the air time.

But they don't.
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 13:05
Comment from: Brooklyn [Visitor]
We get it Judge Smells, you're a crusty old white guy and have no use for anything or anybody but other crusty old white guys!
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 20:42
Comment from: Joe Cool [Visitor] Email
Chris,
You forgot that during that 7.5 hours of coverage, 3.25 hours were commercials. The women's purse was a little over $1,000,000 while the men's purse was just over $7,000,000. I just love equality in sports!!
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 21:41
Comment from: Joe Cool [Visitor] Email
Chris,
You forgot that during that 7.5 hours of coverage, 3.25 hours were commercials. The women's purse was a little over $1,000,000 while the men's purse was just over $7,000,000. I just love equality in sports!!
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 21:42
Comment from: JR [Visitor] Email
Joe Cool... the women can have access to the larger purses..all they have to do is qualify for the tournament while competing from the back tees... (unless you're Michelle Wie then you get everything handed to you).
Permalink 2007-08-05 @ 22:10
Comment from: Brandon Tucker [Member] Email · http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/brandon.tucker
The purse was $2 million not $1...

But I was also bummed out about the (lack of) coverage. How was Reno-Tahoe worthy of replays over the Women's Open at St. Andrews?! Clearly current exposure is not living up to potential.
Permalink 2007-08-06 @ 02:22
The $$$$ they make is directly proportional to the asses they put in the seats.

It's that way in every sport and has nothing to with gender beyond what the viewers want to see. Apparently they don't want to see much women's golf.
Permalink 2007-08-06 @ 07:29
Comment from: The Constructivist [Visitor] Email · http://mlyhlss.blogspot.com/
Yeah, but it doesn't help when the golfy media features stories on the slowness over the quality of play. And (up till the last round Sunday) focused on Ochoa's shortcomings (choker! hasn't won a major! needs to validate her #1 ranking) rather than on potential showdowns between her and Sorenstam or her and Pak. But I guess that's part of the problem--if people who are paid to write about the sport can't be bothered to come up with interesting story ideas, that attention deficit disorder needs to be taken on head-on.

Bivens's major problem is she can't figure out how to turn the globalization of women's golf into an asset for an American tour. It seems like the major promotional efforts are reserved for the young Americans. While it's true they've been having great seasons, so have Jee Young Lee, Mi Hyun Kim, Se Ri Pak, and Seon Hwa Lee. But the key problem is with the way they handle Ochoa. She has a Tiger-esque lead on her top competitors, but you don't see much effort to promote her.

Maybe she should try to qualify for some men's events!
Permalink 2007-08-08 @ 04:43
Comment from: Oui Oui Oui [Visitor] Email
The reasons people don't care to watch the Women Open is because Lorena is a foreing national, not terribly attractive, and do not generate buzz.

I believe Ping only signed her to a contract a couple of months ago after she became #1 ranked female golfers in the world even though she has been playing Ping equipment since she was 16.
Permalink 2007-08-08 @ 17:31

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?
-

Misc

GolfPublisher.com Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site
Course Reviews | US Golf Guide | Resort Features | Travel Features | Golf Instruction | Golf Schools | Golf Packages | Free Vacation Quote

© Copyright 1997-2008, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us!
Privacy Policy