Montreux Golf and Country Club will eat Michelle Wie alive: So long, confidence
I long ago dubbed myself the worst golf-playing golf writer in the world, yet I love monster golf courses. There’s nothing quite like a track that’s geared toward leaving bruises. I’ve played some of the toughest courses in the world and left feeling better about golf after most of them.
Only one golf course has ever made me consider walking off in utter frustration. Only one ever had me raising a club to seriously consider flinging it - a la USA Today golf blogger Larry Olmsted. That one was Montreux Golf and Country Club.
Which happens to be the same course that Michelle Wie will be teeing off on this afternoon in her latest playing-with-the-men sideshow.
Now, I usually think it’s silly for average golfers to compare their games to pros - even a pro who still somehow fails to realize she’s never proved she deserves these shots on the PGA Tour. But I’d stack my self confidence up against Wie’s (you have to be pretty secure to play like I do) and I know Montreux is one of those courses that can yank it from you quickly.
It’s been amusing to see the Wie Warriors cite yardages on par 4s and the like in arguing that Wie has the slightest chance of making the cut. Montreux’s not a course where mere yardage tells the story - though at 7,500 yards, it’s certainly daunting there too. It’s an intimidating course with canyon carries, big drops and tall trees to mess with the truly horrid drives.
I played it from the back tees - with three other golf writers who thought they were better than they were - and was the shortest hitter in the group, which Wie will surely be in hers too despite the distance myths that came with her false hype legend. Montreux intimidates more and more as the day goes on and the relief never comes. The altitude of the course can be more confounding than comforting as well. You think being so high, more distance will be added to your shots than actually is. You get a boost, but not as mega a boost as you expect.
This just shows all the great “scouting” that goes into Team Wie’s decisions. They could scarcely have picked a worse course, one that’s more likely to produce another carted off on a stretcher from “exhaustion” scenario.
I gutted it out and finished my round that Montreux day. Will Wie even manage that?
That’s the question, not whether she can make the cut.
| « Only the black bears save pathetic geezers in U.S. Senior Open from complete obscurity | By skipping the PGA Championship, Greg Norman shows he's no hypocrite » |
30 comments
As Wie once stated so profoundly, "the problem is the ball didn't go where I was aiming." I can hardly wait.
Fridays cut will show who will play on the weekend.
I don't think Michelle will even be close but stranger things have happened. I believe she shot 81 on Wednesday, a good indication of how she will fair.
http://golf.about.com/b/2008/07/31/clearing-up-wies-womens-british-open-choice.htm
Putt4par
During the Pro-Am Michelle had 3 birdies, 1 bogey, 4 double bogeys and 1 triple bogey. I think she is going to be about 15 strokes back of the leader after the first round. We will then hear the familiar refrain of..."my score does not really reflect how well I played" and "tomorrow I will have to shoot a really low round to get back in the tournament."
She's even on the turn.
Go Bibbles
Gotta give her credit for being persistent. That is how things get done in the end.
MW is T77 tied with 6, but just one shot back of 23 more players. +1 should make the cut easily, and +2 has a good chance of making the cut as well--and the cut could be higher. I think Wie would be happy enough to post another 73 tomorrow, and hope things work out in the afternoon.
Wie had a great round today, and it's asking a lot to expect her to do the same tomorrow--but if she does I think she will make the cut.
After he misses the cut he can ask for an exemption on the Futures Tour.
I'll just go with 73-70 in this event to end up at minus one for two rounds.
If she signs her score card.
What this means for those who aren't very well-acquainted with golf, is that it was probably a fluky round.
Pacrim,
I've said on numerous occasions that she'll eventually make the cut if given enough chances. However, read my first two paragraphs and then understand that there is something called deviation toward the mean.
So predictable.
Good grief Charlie Brown, when is it all going to end??
You came close in your prediction. You only missed by ten strokes.
But you can take solace from your idol, Bubbles.
As she might say, there is a fine line betwwen 70 and 80.
Alex USMC 1969-73
Her second-round 80 shows that she has absolutely no backbone whatsoever.
You can rave over her tee shots or marketing value all day long, but the inescapable truth is this: Michelle DOES NOT have the abilities to cope under pressure that all other true champions have (regardless of whether we're talking about PGA Tour or LPGA Tour).
Or maybe not.
I predict she will get the top 3 she needs in the Canadian to get her LPGA card for next year==and I think this week will help give her the confidence she needs to do so.
I have to agree with you about Michelle under pressure. Over the years we have seen her fold too many times when she has those dreaded last five holes to play on Sunday with the LPGA and on Friday with the PGA. When she took that 7 on a par five that for everyone was a birdie hole, she seemed to loose it and knowing she could not make the cut, simply said "to hell with it." Some think that she will make enough money from the Canadian Open to get her LPGA card for 2009. Frankly, I doubt if she even wants her LPGA card for 2009. I feel that she would be happy to just have the six exemptions for next year and be invited back for the Legends. If she still has the mindset to continue college, then forget about the LPGA as a present career.
this has been the last thing that David Far. has told the winner of the last two tourneys on tv..this is not fair at all.. after what happen to Michelle Wie.. the golfers should not be reminded by any outsider unless they are going to sat their and tell each golfer that finishes to go sign your scorecard..
On the PGA she needs to follow her own advice, and just try to play each hole the best she can without worrying about the cut. On the LPGA she should do the same and the wins will come.
For the Canadian Open, top 3 is almost as good as a win. That is something she has done before, and she seems to be back to her old form. Going for top 3 means less pressure than going for a win, and that should actually help her chances of getting a win.
On the LPGA once she gets the monkey off her back, I expect her to win regularly.
Comments are closed for this post.


Recent comments