TravelGolf.com
- Updated Daily |
Golf Search
-
Course ReviewsCourse GuideResort FeaturesTravel FeaturesGolf InstructionGolf PackagersReader Forums
The Daily Blog Archives
Jennifer Mario   Jennifer Mario
   a TravelGolf.com Blog
-
Blog Home | The Daily Blog | Worldwide Golf Blogs | Free Golf Podcasts

Callaway, Titleist, and Ping: keep bragging. Tim: pipe down.

Thursday May 26, 2005 | 10:00:21 249 words, 1374 views
Win a free golf book!

In his latest blog, Tim McDonald claims that all the high-tech golf equipment coming out by the truckloads are just rip-offs. He says, “you could go out and shoot just as well with those old persimmon drivers in the back of your garage you haven’t used for years.”

Okay, Tim. And I guess all the changes made to championship courses each year, to make them more difficult, are due to the fact that Tour players are just getting that much better? If that’s the case, then why is poor Gary Player tearing his hair out?

And if equipment has nothing to do with it, then why am I always hearing that same tired old argument, “24-year-old Jack Nicklaus would’ve kicked Tiger’s a** if he’d had the same equipment Tiger plays with!”

True, most of us aren’t PGA-caliber, and for the average player, the 454cc driver might not actually be any better for us than last year’s 434cc driver. But it’s better than the driver from ten years ago, and it’s better than the old persimmon.

Tim, if you’re so convinced that new equipment does nothing, go out tomorrow and see how you do with some old hickory-shafted mashies and niblicks. While you’re at it, switch out your Pro V1x’s for some featheries and gutta perchas. And after posting your worst score of the year, maybe you’ll be able to appreciate what Callaway, Titleist, and Ping bring to the game.


Comments:

Comment from: R. Smith [Visitor]
Lord, I hate to chime in in the Old Man's defense! But Tim DID start out his blog with "A New York Times story confirms ..." And his second 'graph reads: "The National Golf Foundation reports that ... the average score for the average golfer still stands at around 100, AS IT HAS FOR DECADES." [CAPS MINE FOR EMPHASIS]

So while I'm all for throwing rotten tomatoes at old cranks like McDonald, it's not like he's just making up this stuff.
Permalink 05/27/05 @ 02:55
Comment from: Jennifer Mario [Member] Email
Sure, the average golfer's score is still around 100. Because with his new equipment, the average golfer drives his ball even deeper into the woods than he was before. Fancy equipment can't replace skill, after all. That's why the true test of the equipment is made by the pros. And look what they're doing, their scores are so low now that golf course architects are complaining that golf courses "are obsolete."

If the average golfer would go out and get some lessons to go along with those new clubs, there's no telling what his average score would be.
Permalink 05/27/05 @ 10:34
Comment from: Ronald S. Montesano [Visitor] · http://www.buffalogolfer.com
I concur with JM. The AVERAGE golfer takes no more lessons today, nor practices the short game, nor works out the golfing muscles, nor ponders its mysteries, than she/he has done in decades past. What the AVERAGE golfer does do is purchase more and dream more and expect more. I was recently given two sets of irons, both from the 1970s: Wilson Staff and MacGregor Tourney. I hit the ball on the sweet spot a lot, and pured these babies deep into the woods behind my house. Heaven forbid that I should mishit them, though. If Scottish Kings via edict could not force citizens to practice their archery, how can we expect AVERAGE golfers to practice their golf?
Permalink 05/28/05 @ 17:23
Comment from: Anonymous [Visitor]
Well, I'm split. Yes, Tim is right in saying that they are a rip-off (but what isn't?) and that they're not magic clubs. HOWEVER, I must agree with Jennifer and say that hitting a 1940's club WILL make a difference. I use "medium-quality" clubs and have not had any trouble. I have used very old ones and I was undershooting my average distance a bit. And finally, I used a new Taylor Made (I can't remember the model) and I noticed a definite difference (all for the better). I think that this whole issue is a matter of opinion. So stop bitching please...
Permalink 05/29/05 @ 13:03
Comment from: Chase [Visitor]
I am all with JM on this one. A few days ago I switched from a 5-6 year old driver, to a brand new TaylorMade R540. Although not the best club on the market by any means, what a difference it made. My drives are now much straighter and an average of 20-30 yds. farther.
Permalink 06/28/05 @ 00:29

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?
-

Misc

GolfPublisher.com Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site
Course Reviews | US Golf Guide | Resort Features | Travel Features | Golf Instruction | Golf Schools | Golf Packages | Free Vacation Quote

© Copyright 1997-2008, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us!
Privacy Policy