![]() |
|
||
Get ED drug ads out of golf broadcasts!
Monday June 6, 2005 | 16:15:11 503 words, 3209 views
Televised golf has gotten about as bad as it can get. In fact, it’s gotten downright obscene. And I’m not talking about David Toms’ middle finger. Before elaborating, let me say that I am pretty much the furthest thing from a prude you can find. In fact, I think Paris Hilton’s Hardee’s commercial is just fine. But what is really, truly offensive is the BARRAGE of ads for erectile dysfunction meds that bombard us golf viewers at every commercial break. I mean come on. We golfers were just beginning to shake the stereotype of being fashion-challenged, only to be thought of now as limp and lifeless. And I ain’t talking about our hair. Why are these commercials so offensive? Let me see…: First, have you ever looked at the women on these commercials? They are complete babes. If the guy can’t get going on his own just looking at these hotties, he should stay on the course. Second, have you looked at the guys? The oldest is 50, tops, and looks to be in impeccable shape. These are NOT the guys who typically require Viagra, Cialis, or Levitra. Third, by portraying the target audience of these ads as young and vibrant, the advertisers are insinuating into the minds of 40- and 50-somethings that they might in fact need such drugs. “Hmmm…,” we think, “I’m not quite 21 anymore. Maybe I DO need a helping hand, when a helping hand seems to take longer than it used to…” Fourth, the damn warning: “Erections lasting more than four hours, require immediate medical attention.” Four hours!?!? What’s a doctor going to do, unless he sends over a nurse with a very short skirt and fishnet stockings? If I’m going for four hours, I’m calling an agent, not a doctor, and getting into a very different business. Fifth, I was dead serious about the Paris Hilton thing earlier: I find these ED ads far more offensive. If my six-year-old asks me why Hilton is gyrating and eating a burger, all I need to say is this: “Companies want people to remember their names. One way to do that is to get people to remember their ads. People like to look at pretty women (and men), and at least some people think Hilton is pretty (I am not among them). So they will remember this ad because they will remember her. Then, maybe, they’ll want to buy a burger.” But when my daughter asks what a Levitra ad is about, I have to say something like this: “Well, when a man gets older, the blood flow to his penis sometimes gets restricted, which makes it more difficult to achieve and maintain….” See what I mean? Honestly, which is more uncomfortable? So spare me the indignities flung at Hilton and Hardee’s. Until the geriatric softcore of the ED ads is removed from middle-of-the-day golf broadcasts, the religious right and other objectors don’t have a third leg to stand on. Comments:
I'm with you, Kiel. And don't look now, but here comes the Cialis Western Open at the end of this month. How'd you like to have that on your resume? Winner: Cialis Western Open. It's just embarrassing.
Comment from: Mr Prude [Visitor]
Why does everyone who has this kind of comment start off by saying "I'm not prude but ...?" Well, I am a Christian and I am prude, so excuse me if I would like to watch a bit of t.v. and not be bombarded with foul language and sex.
Starting off comments like that tell everyone else "It is o.k. that I have this opinion because I am not prude."
Otherwise, I share your same annoyance with all the E.D. ads. It makes me feel uncomfortable to have Golf (golf of all things!!) on while my neice is in the same room.
Comment from: Kiel Christianson [Visitor]
Mr. Prude asks, essentially, "Why the disclaimer?" It's not a justification of an opinion; it's a rhetorical device. Specifically, such a statement is a pre-emptive strike against those who might disagree with your thesis not because of the content of that thesis, but because they disagree with a larger world-view that the thesis might imply (whether that implication is intentional, or accurate, or not).
Comment from: Shanks [Visitor]
Puh-leeeaaase stop! When are we as a society going to get over this guilt and/or embarrassment of normal sexual relationship matters. I somehow doubt that any physicians are offended by the ED ads. And we're all sorry if parents are put in the position of having to actually perform parental functions, like helping your children have a healthy attitude about sex.
Does anyone realize what the demographics are for golf telecasts? Predominantly male, I believe. And who could blame a guy for wanting to enhance his "performance" level? If they invented a "longer & straighter tee shots" pill, that would probably sell very well also ... even to women.
Comment from: Bill From PA [Visitor]
Quote:' If they invented a "longer & straighter tee shots" pill, that would probably sell very well also ... even to women.'
Agreed! I'm always looking for something to help me get it straighter, and into the hole.
Comment from: jimmy [Visitor] · http://cleveland
It's discusting...This is bad for golf any sport...Drugs like these are personal should never be put on TV...
Comments are closed for this post. |
My Latest posts
Check it out!
Misc |
|||||||||
| Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site | |
| © Copyright 1997-2009, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us! |
|