![]() |
|
||
Made-for-TV events: Fun? Obscene? Obscene fun?
Tuesday June 28, 2005 | 20:06:43 604 words, 1523 views
So all of you who wondered why I was writing about Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes last week were certainly justified. “Why here?” you hollered. Fair enough. I guess I figured if David Feherty could report on his struggle with Demon Rum (or Demon Irish Whiskey in his case) in Golf Magazine, I could vent about the Cult of Fame we in America seem so obsessed with. But back to the golf: The made-for-TV-event The ING Par-3 Shootout wrapped up today at Treetops Resort in Gaylord, Michigan. If you don’t feel like staying up for the tape-delayed coverage on ESPN2, Andy North was your winner. North pocketed $350,000. Gary McCord was second with $90,000, and defending champion Fred Couples and Phil Mickelson tied for third with $50,000. Now, speaking of the Cult of Fame, I must say that I am conflicted about events like the Par-3 Shootout. I covered the mini-skins game for three years, and was standing just 12 feet from Lee Trevino when he aced the 8th hole on the first day in 2001, thereby winning $1.01 million bucks. This was the single most lucrative single swing in the history of the game, and I high-fived Lee Trevino. So I will admit: I loved the event in person. I got to watch Lee’s son and Fred Couples’s son caddy for their old men. I got to ride around the course during a pro-am with Phil Mickelson and talk about our daughters and psychology (Phil was a psych major). I got to hang out with Rick Smith before he became a media darling and hear all sorts of great stories about the pros he’s tutored over the years. I loved to play the course, Threetops, as it was set up for the tourney. Nevertheless, I couldn’t shake the ambivalence: Why should I, or any one else, want to watch rich guys getting richer? True, North’s winnings this year for two 9-hole days dwarfed his best year on the PGA TOUR ($212,268 in 1985), and he’s not exactly lighting fires on the Champions Tour. But I’m guessing his commentator gig at ESPN and appearance fees as a former U.S. Open Champ are still keeping him comfy. But $50,000 for Mickelson and Couples? These guys spend more than that on dinner. Heck, when Couples won the event in 2002 and earned $410,000, I was the only media guy in the trailer when he called home and told his assistant to tell his wife that they should buy “that land in Montana.” Oh, hooray for Boom-Boom! He can now feed his kids…and buy acreage in Big Sky Country! But I was also the only media guy with Trevino’s agent as he called St. Jude Children’s Hospital and told them that they were going to receive $500,000 – half of Lee’s take for that ace. Events like these were conceived in a day when all but the elite pro golfers were scraping by. In a day when future baseball Hall of Famers like Harmon Killebrew were handing out free samples of Vienna Sausages in grocery stores on off days to pay the bills (I know, I got a sample from Mr. Killebrew once). Do they have any relevance today, when purses at the second or third-tier PGA Tour events reach upwards of $3.5 million? I don’t know. I do know that I will be watching the Par-3 Shootout tonight on ESPN2. But I also know I’ll be fighting ambivalence throughout – pleasure at watching good golf on a course I know well, distaste for watching rich guys get richer while I ponder my ballooning credit card balance. Comments:
Comment from: RJ [Visitor]
and by watching you support the very event you despise...way to go genius...honestly, is everyone on this site this hypocritical and illogical in their arguments? cripes
Comment from: Kiel Christianson [Visitor]
Who said I "despised" it? I said I was ambivalent. Look it up, RJ. cripes...
Comment from: Mike Hamilton [Visitor]
Hey, I like watching the shootout and it doesn't really matter to me how much these guys win. It is nice to see them as just a bunch of guys out having a good time, joking with one another. The only thing missing is a cooler of beer to enjoy between holes.
I'm ambivalent about despising . . . oh, never mind. One of the reasons our household doesn't have cable t.v. is the impending arrival of The Ocho; having so many t.v. programs to choose from would make me want to watch them. So I restrict my addiction to tens of minutes a day on the web, and feel I am a better member of the family for it. That said, it is a razor's edge: par three is different and cool. It would make sense that a sweet par three course (holes ranging from 80 to 280 yards) that tested every club in the bag ought to make a buck for a community. It would make sense that hole-in-one potential on every swing would make golf exciting. However, overwhelmed as we are with fake-reality t.v., made-for-tv golf events where the rich (in personality, talent and finances) get richer are not going away. While we would want to see the down-on-her/his-luck person triumph in a Horatio Alger match play event, the Phils, Lees, Andies, and Booms of the world captivate us as much with their presence as with their play.
Comment from: Mike Hamilton [Visitor]
One additional comment, have the organizers ever given thought to the possibility of having the fans of this format submit their names to take a place of one of the foursome and have a chance at some cash? How exciting would it be to watch three pros and one weekend/weekday duffer all compete and have a chance at a million dollars for a hole in one. It could be a lifechanging moment for a regular Joe and on a par 3 hole, we all have the same chance to get lucky. Just an idea.
Comment from: Terry Hanson [Visitor] · http://www.hansonenterprises.net
Doing a little surfing and saw your blog on the ING Par 3 Shootout, Kiel.. I am one of the organizers having made the deal for the course seven years ago for ESPN and I continue to work the event yearly. I have also made note of your comment, Mike Hamilton, about regular guys (like us!!) being a part of that event. I promise I will look into it and appreciate guys like Kiel watching and for constructive comments like Mike suggested.. You might be surprised how much guys like me do listen to folks like yourselves who follow the game. The PGA Tour sanctioning of this event does not make some of the things I have heard in the past as easy as it may appear like adding Annika to the field; changing dates, etc etc, but that does not mean we do not listen or try to improve this event every year. You keep watching and we'll keep trying.....Terry Hanson
Comment from: Greg Pinelli [Visitor]
Terry..Glad you're so amenable to suggestions! Instead of a group of has beens lets have a par 3 face off where some real battle of the sexes blood might boil....Paula and Annika against Vijay and Phil. Who knows...this might actually mark the watershed where women compete with men on an equal or better basis. Remember...if you steal this idea and pretend you thought of it on some beach somewhere...the whole world knows...By the by..and I don't mean this in a nasty way. But, really, how come all you smart TV guys couldn't think of this one earlier??
Comment from: Mike Hamilton [Visitor]
Thanks Terry for your comments to my last post. It is nice to know that there are others out there who take a moment to listen to others and consider other options that they may have not thought about before. I live in Dayton Ohio and had the pleasure of attending the Senior Open held here last week. It was also my first time attending a USGA event and I had the time of my life. It was great watching the guys I grew up watching and seeing them play. I was able to see Arnold Palmer on his last, or at least what he said was his last round in a Major. What a dream come true to be able to see the golfers my Dad and I watched after playing our early morning Sunday round. Keep up the good work the the Par Three shootout. My ultimate fantasy would be to be able to play a round of golf with Lee Trevino. He was my fathers favorite golfer and after my Dad passed away in 1987, I have really missed being able to play golf with the person who instilled in me the thrill for the game. Maybe someday, I will be fortunate enough to realize my dream but who knows. Once again, thanks again for listening......Mike Hamilton
Comment from: Terry Hanson [Visitor] · http://www.hansonenterprises.net
Greg and Mike: a personal e mail sent me back to this site..One thing I've learned is to listen to the viewer as the ultimate consumer..The Annika and Paula idea would certainly improve the scenery and this idea and many, many others are all considered when I spend my nine months of the year in Fiji where all of my TV friends gather to sit on the beach..Seriously; good ideas, but the buisness proposition is with the PGA Tour in terms of sanctioning and their org fills the type of field we must present. TV Releases, rights fees, etc make this more complicated than it appears, but thanks for the idea...Mike, Thanks for the kind words as well; I will respond to you separately.....
Leave a comment: |
My Latest posts
Check it out!
Misc |
|||||||||
| Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site | |
| © Copyright 1997-2008, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us! |
|