« A Professional Olive Branch To The Staff of GolfweekPinehurst Peregrination...Who can resist alliteration? »

16 comments

Comment from: Barry Shipes [Visitor] Email
While I am respectful of your attempts for charity in the past, I have to say....Wake Forest knew better than to keep you around and you can only play 100 holes of golf by yourself? Doesn't anyone want to be around you? lol

Ron, you obviously know good golf(after all, you coach young girls)so I am hopeful that you actually understand what these young men have gone through to get where they are. They have scrificed doing what normal teenagers do just to become better at their sport. Your words do little to build self esteem in them and just because you may be bitter over your golf career, or lack of it, you needn't tear them down to point out flaws in the ranking system and with certain protocols associated with it. I only wish you could re-write this article without making it seem that the young men involved are somehow tainted.

Think baout it.
08/03/09 @ 21:37
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? I honestly can't make sense of anything here. My complaint is that Golfweek's group of analysts appears to have a vendetta against a writer on a rival paper/site and that they should overcome this jealousy and give Van Sickle the credit he deserves.
08/03/09 @ 22:02
Comment from: Matthew Raymond [Visitor] Email
I stopped reading your blog after you dismissed Nathan Smith because he is a mid-am. Clearly, amateur golf isn't what you spend a lot of time researching, considering how many mid-ams have played on Walker Cup teams. Van Sickle can play and had a good college season, but he's had a horrible summer. Just ask him at the next Van Sickle BBQ you attend.
08/03/09 @ 22:09
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
Har dee har, har. There is a CRITICAL difference between "played" and "made a difference." Not since the days of Jay Sigel (a US Am winner) has a mid-am made a difference. I liked Tripp Kuehne, but he rarely scored points. Same goes for Zahringer and all the other mid-ams. Clearly, amateur golf IS what I spend a lot of time researching. Don't let your emotions control your commentary, Matthew. The BBQ quote, while erroneous, is humorous.
08/03/09 @ 22:18
Comment from: Olivia [Visitor] Email
Hahah! Way to disguise a FINAL-ROUND 77 at the Porter Cup as "put himself into position to 1) Win the Porter Cup" and the fact that he MISSED THE CUT when two other Walker Cuppers nearly WON the event as "put himself into position to... 2) Make the cut at last week’s Nationwide event"
08/03/09 @ 22:25
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
He did put himself in position, Olivia. He did not close the deal, nor did Tim Mickelson, Bud Cauley and a host of others. For complete transparency, Van Sickle also played the back nine on Friday in +3 to miss the cut at the Nationwide event by 1. He doesn't seal the deal in multi-round events, but he gets it done in single-round competition. That's why I dismiss Golfweek's exclusion of him from the team.
08/04/09 @ 12:46
Comment from: Tom [Visitor]
guys, he just trying to suck up to van sickle but it wont work because every golf writer knows this guy is a wanna be goof who couldn't write his name in the snow. I do hear that every so often a bunch of guys get together and have a contest...they all chip in 20 bucks and read ron mons crap and the last one to burst out laughing gets the money.
08/04/09 @ 15:35
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
Tom hears a lot of voices...pity him. However, after years of practice, he ascended to the pantheon of name-in-snow writers, so applaud him, please.
08/05/09 @ 00:43
Comment from: Jeff Babineau [Visitor] Email
Ron
Sometimes you get what you wish for -- in this case, a rebuttal from the team at Golfweek. You called where we placed Mike Van Sickle in our Walker Cup Watch List a "pathetic attempt ... to get the competition" and said it "reeks of professional jealousy." My reaction: Laughable, really. I'm willing to bet Golfweek has written more about the rise of Mike Van Sickle at Marquette than any other publication; in fact, we hold him in such high regard that earlier this year we devoted several pages of instruction showing Mike and his instructor and exhibiting what he works on with his game. We have not done that with too many amateurs. The three of us who cover the PGA Tour on a regular basis -- Jeff Rude, Jim McCabe and I -- are all longtime friends with Mike's dad, Gary, going back to his days with Golf World. Personally, I've played golf with Mike and was thoroughly impressed, not only by his length and overall game but with the fact he's a great kid, too. At Golfweek, we wish him nothing but the best. Bottom line: Anyone with a computer can offer opinion and write blogs, but it's far better to write them from a foundation of being informed. Ron, please do your homework a little better next time.
Respectfully, and feeling not so petty in Orlando,
Jeff Babineau, Editor
Golfweek
08/05/09 @ 15:15
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
Hopefully all will read my follow-up blog entry, titled "A Professional Olive Branch to the Staff of Golfweek."
08/05/09 @ 18:32
Comment from: Tom [Visitor]
Babs, don't waste your time on this panty-waist nerd, this greasy, matted-haired, nerve-rattling geek with string warts. He's worthless and dumber than rocks.
08/06/09 @ 21:51
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
Jeff, meet Tom; Tom, Jeff. If you're lucky, he'll fixate on you and abandon me...oh wait, that would make me lucky. Tom, have you seen "Blades of Glory"? You are the stalker...it finally became crystal clear.
08/06/09 @ 23:03
Comment from: Tom [Visitor]
all you were trying to do was suck up to van sickle and the s.i. guys. you know less about golf than you do about...ahem..."writing" a sentence that people can read. is it my fault people read my responses? surely they cant read your...ahem..."writing"...you're illiterate! dude, you are the worst on the page and on the internet...and you;re too stupid to realized you just had doors closed to you permanently in the industry...and you thought you were hated before?
08/07/09 @ 00:34
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
Actually, Doubting Thomas, YOU thought I was hated before, and you'll continue to do so until the end of eternity. I do believe that if you ever took a step back from your vitriol and assessed one of my writings with an unbiased nose, I might keel over and die (which I believe is your goal, no?)
08/07/09 @ 06:47
Comment from: Tom [Visitor]
I'd read your obituary with great pleasure. - Clarance Darrow I wouldn't attend the funeral, but I''d send a nice letter saying I approve of it - Mark Twain. ***OH SNAP!***
08/07/09 @ 12:15
Comment from: Ron Mon [Member] Email
and the band played on...
08/07/09 @ 17:09

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
Golf Itineraries

Simply select where you want to play, find a tee time deal, and golf now!

Dates: January 1, 2012 - May 27, 2012
Experience this new and exciting Tournament, The Brother Brother Invitational at St Andrews, is a team event for siblings to enjoy a weekend of golf and camaraderie in St Andrews the Home of Golf. This package offers brothers the perfect opportunity to play 4 rounds of great golf, have plenty of fun, experience the magic that is St Andrews as a location.
Price range: £1600