A Change in the Rules of Golf
A recent post from reader Oliver Sudden basically posed the question, “Should some of the Rules of Golf be changed?” A most interesting query, this, in particular as it relates to the oscillating ball issue. Because the answer is yes, change the damn rule. Paraphrasing, the rule in question (18-2-b) says that once the golfer has addressed the ball, and it moves before a stroke is started, the golfer is deemed to have caused it to move and is charged one stroke – and must replace the ball back where it was before moving.
This is a prime example of where the game has outgrown a rule. When this rule was originally implemented, the manicuring of greens wasn’t terribly far removed from having the local livestock chew on it. Less than a hundred years ago, putting surfaces were only slightly better than shaggy under the best of conditions. For example, Augusta National was built 75 years ago with greens that have more contour than you can believe – until you see them in person. That’s because they were designed for relatively s-l-o-w putting, not anything like how they are today. I wonder how Alistair Mackenzie and Bobby Jones would have shaped the greens had they seen the modern grooming equipment in use today.
Since we have these lightning quick surfaces to play on where an ill-timed gust of wind may move a ball already at rest, and the player potentially pays a price for that, we have to watch them staring at a ball from 1-2 feet away to see if it is moving. Ridiculous. Now, I’m not advocating we change the rules to be “fair”. Golf, as life, is not going to be fair. But the rules are supposed to reflect what is reasonable. And they also rely on those playing to have some integrity. In light of all the self-imposed penalties I have seen over the years, I believe we can trust the very best players in the world to say whether or not they caused the ball to move prior to starting the putting stroke.
| « No More Aquaman, Please | 2008 Fantasy Golf Draft has Shanks Looking Good » |
24 comments
I have wondered for a long time why some players make millions playing golf while others seemingly equal in ability don't make it. I have watched a number of really big winners on the PGA Tour like Fuzzy Zoeller, Calvin Peete, Nolan Henke, and Lee Janzen close up when they were at the top of their games and none of them looked like anything special. I have concluded the key is being able to play your best when it really matters. There comes a time in each players life where what he does the next round, next 9, or even next hole is a career changer. The millionaires are the guys that don't blow it.
time/opportunity for the wind/contours to move the ball. In windy conditions, it's a great strategy.
Another reason why Jack Nicklaus didn't ground his putter was that it made his stroke a little smoother. If you ground the putter you are not able to return it to the same position as address.
PS Will reading Feinstein's book help me not to blow it on the 18th?
With the DQ of Cink, this means that if you take a stance in a bunker with ball o/s it on the very first hole, do not go into another bunker for that entire round or you will be deemed to have "tested" a similar hazard, and incur a 2-stroke penalty. Would it have been OK for Goydos' caddy to have raked the bunker instead of Stewart or his caddy? Or was simply taking a stance in it testing it? Was the interpretation of the rule under these circumstances "reasonable" (as opposed to fair)? Honestly cannot remember if I have ever done this (not that I go into a lot of bunkers of course), but if I have I am sure I never knew of this rule at the time.
Oh, it was Las Vegas, of course.
Think you have already made your position clear on Kiel's blog.
This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...


Recent comments