![]() |
|
||
Stupid LPGA Rules Affect World’s Best Female Golfers, Lorena Ochoa and Jiyai Shin
Thursday March 12, 2009 | 12:24:54 265 words, 30499 views
Listed by increasing level of stupidity, here are three LPGA rules currently in place. Stupid Rule #3 – Any earnings from an official LPGA event are considered unofficial if earned while playing on a sponsor’s exemption, even if the player is a current LPGA member. LPGA rookie Jiyai Shin won an unofficial $24,349 in the Honda LPGA Thailand event 2 weeks ago. If these earnings were counted she would be on top of the current Official Money List. While that may not seem very important now, it certainly could be at the end of the year. Stupider Rule #2 – Any wins in official LPGA events by non-LPGA members are considered “unofficial” wins in the record book. In 2008 Jiyai Shin won 3 official events as a non-member, including a Major championship: the Women’s British Open, the Tour Championship and one other regular LPGA stop. Again, that may seem unimportant now, but when you look ahead, induction into the Hall of Fame could be decided on that very thing. It is also the same, silly reasoning that kept her from being an official invitee to the Thailand event above. Stupidest Rule #1 – The LPGA takes great pride in claiming that induction into their Hall of Fame is based on results. While the numbers needed to get in are arbitrary, that is acceptable. But it is also based on years of active membership. Ten years, to be precise. What possible difference does that make? Lorena Ochoa passed the threshold for accomplishments last year. She qualified for the Hall of Fame BASED ON MERIT in April 2008 but can’t be inducted for another four years. Comments:
Comment from: The Constructivist [Visitor]
On #3, what if a sponsor really liked someone (say, Michelle Wie) at #101 on the money list and invited her into the Korean event at the end of the season? Should she knock out of the top 100 or top 80 someone who wouldn't get that kind of opportunity?
On #2, Hound Dog's got that covered. Shin's wins are official and do count toward her HOF total. All the LPGA does is draw a line between pre-member and member wins. On #1, the 10 years' rule is kind of dumb, come to think of it. I guess the argument could be made it rewards longevity or something like that, but I won't make it.
Comment from: Andy Brown of GolfSwingSecretsRevealed.com [Visitor]
Here is the deal. I really don’t think the first rule you mentioned is all that silly. Imagine the scenario on some of the tours and their nascent stage where a top finish on the order of merit list might open the door to a lot of other tournaments. Now if someone like Tiger Woods, plays a big money Asian Tour and makes a load of money, much more than the other members who might have played the tour the rest of the season, it does not mean you can make him the order of merit champion. It is exactly the reason why they have such a reason in place that ensures that the order of merit is a fairly balanced method to determine the most successful player on tour each year. Once Jiyai Shin becomes an LPGA Tour regular then this problem will never arise.
In the second case, however, I completely agree with you. The decision to induct someone into the hall of fame must be completely based on merit and not a farcical criteria of waiting for the hair to grey before they make someone a hall of fame member. Leave a comment: |
My Latest posts
Check it out!
Misc |
|||||||||
![]() |
Add GolfPublisher.com articles/headlines to your web site |
| © Copyright 1997-2009, WorldGolf.com, LLC. For questions, comments or suggestions on any of our network publications, Contact Us! |
|