<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/4.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Golf with Shanks - Latest Comments on Where in the World is Shanks?  Golfing at Pinehurst Resort</title>
		<link>http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/shanks?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/shanks?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=1348" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US-utf8</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=4.0.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Spencer Hux [Member] in response to: Where in the World is Shanks?  Golfing at Pinehurst Resort</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Spencer Hux [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c13511@http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/</guid>
			<description>I do love the creativity that #2 brings into play around the greens. I think what I love about the other courses I mentioned is the shot quality that certain holes demand. While Pinehurst demands a creative short game, the Ocean Course demands accurate and solid tee shots, and Harbour Town demands that a player be able to work the ball to score worth a damn. I think the shot quality from the other courses has left more of an impression on my memory, which is one of the problems. I really do think if I play #2 again I will appreciate it much more. That&#039;s what tends to happen with great courses.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hit em well.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I do love the creativity that #2 brings into play around the greens. I think what I love about the other courses I mentioned is the shot quality that certain holes demand. While Pinehurst demands a creative short game, the Ocean Course demands accurate and solid tee shots, and Harbour Town demands that a player be able to work the ball to score worth a damn. I think the shot quality from the other courses has left more of an impression on my memory, which is one of the problems. I really do think if I play #2 again I will appreciate it much more. That's what tends to happen with great courses.  <br />
<br />
Hit em well.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/shanks/2006/03/01/where_in_the_world_is_shanks_pinehurst_r#c13511</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Shanks [Member] in response to: Where in the World is Shanks?  Golfing at Pinehurst Resort</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Shanks [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c13456@http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/</guid>
			<description>I can appreciate your comments, Spence. Everybody has their own list of favorites. I too have been fortunate enough to play some of the best courses around, including St. Andrews Old Course and a dozen other links. But for pure fun on a great track, I&#039;d take Pinehurst No. 2. It does not beat you up off the tee and the challenge grows as you get nearer the hole. And I absolutely love the myriad of options presented by the shots around the greens.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can appreciate your comments, Spence. Everybody has their own list of favorites. I too have been fortunate enough to play some of the best courses around, including St. Andrews Old Course and a dozen other links. But for pure fun on a great track, I'd take Pinehurst No. 2. It does not beat you up off the tee and the challenge grows as you get nearer the hole. And I absolutely love the myriad of options presented by the shots around the greens.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/shanks/2006/03/01/where_in_the_world_is_shanks_pinehurst_r#c13456</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Spencer Hux [Member] in response to: Where in the World is Shanks?  Golfing at Pinehurst Resort</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Spencer Hux [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c13454@http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/</guid>
			<description>You&#039;re right about the winter deal at #2 being one of the best deals around. I did it two years ago, and it was called &quot;Number 2 for $222&quot;, which included the hotel, breakfast at the very same buffet, and a round on the course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m not sure I agree about #2 being such a fun course. I loved it, but I think I would enjoy it much more if I got another chance to play it. I&#039;ve been fortunate enough to play Harbour Town, the Ocean Course, Whistling Straits, and Royal St. George&#039;s as well, and #2 is near the end of that list in my opinion. </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're right about the winter deal at #2 being one of the best deals around. I did it two years ago, and it was called "Number 2 for $222", which included the hotel, breakfast at the very same buffet, and a round on the course.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure I agree about #2 being such a fun course. I loved it, but I think I would enjoy it much more if I got another chance to play it. I've been fortunate enough to play Harbour Town, the Ocean Course, Whistling Straits, and Royal St. George's as well, and #2 is near the end of that list in my opinion. ]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.travelgolf.com/blogs/shanks/2006/03/01/where_in_the_world_is_shanks_pinehurst_r#c13454</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
