Golf announcers are strange birds, aren't they? They seem to fall into one of two categories, with varying degrees: Either they're dull, corporate mouthpieces or they're wild, outlandish and outspoken.
Read: Jim Nantz in the first category and Johnny Miller in the latter.
Nantz is so dull he should be nicknamed "Insta-Nap." Pharmaceutical companies should clone his DNA and sell it to psycho wards to calm down the schizophrenics. He should be re-broadcast at kindergartens and high-security prisons, inducing toddlers and inmates into trance-like states that render them sleepy and harmless.
Miller, on the other hand, is the Charles Barkley of golf. He's so brutally candid he was nearly lynched by a group of PGA Tour players at last year's Ford Championship at Doral. He'd criticize his own mother as she was making him a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.
"What mom, you don't have crunchy?"
That's what sets Miller apart, though. Curtis Strange once told the media it wasn't his job to be "negative." No, Curtis, it isn't. Nor is it your job to be "positive." It's your job to be "honest." Miller is one of the few who actually practices this. This is the guy who said Craig Parry's swing "would make Ben Hogan puke."
Granted, golf announcers have a tough job. Golf is a complex game to begin with, and often the commentators have only seconds to offer analyses on situations they see from afar. There's no filter between what they think and what they say. I can erase something stupid I've written, if I catch it in time. Live TV doesn't have a delete key.
They're criticized when they say a player "should" have done this or that, and criticized again when they fail to take a stand. And there is an institutional bias toward candor and any kind of color. Remember Ben Wright, who said female golfers were handicapped by "having boobs?"
Or Gary McCord, who outraged the staid Augusta National membership, when he pointed out at the 1995 Masters how the greens were so quick it was as if they had been "bikini-waxed," and how the 17th green was playing so tough there must be "body bags" buried in the nearby trees.
Wright and McCord are no longer with us.
Still, in general, they talk too much and say too little. And there is that little matter of golf announcers being more than a little sexist, even more so than other sports announcers, according to a study done by a panel of experts at Clemson and Indiana Universities.
In any case, there are a number of annoying habits viewers bring up time and again. Here are some of them - some of which I disagree with - and some of my own.
I always squirm a little when they slobber all over the game's greats, like during live interviews with people like Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus. Treat them with respect, sure, but don't bend over and anoint their feet with oil.June 6, 2005
Simply select where you want to play, find a tee time deal, and golf now!
dz wrote on: Jun 10, 2005
I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM W/ MOST COMMENTATORS, PARTICULARLY ENJOY MILLER AND FINCH. I AM TIRED OF THE ONE CERTAIN NETWORK THAT OD'S ON PUTTING. I THINK A CRUCIAL PUTT SHOULD BE SHOWN, BUT PUTTING CONTESTS ARE HELD AT THE LOCAL "MINIS" WEEKLY. I WANT TO SEE SHOTS.
Reply
bill porteous wrote on: Jun 8, 2005
Suggest you send most of the US golf commentators, with the exception of Miller, Baker Finch and McCord, to the European Tour to watch and listen to the European coverage. The reason golf tv ratings are dropping are due in part to boring commentators and broken coverage with shots of water, trees and a background commentator who sounds right at home reading obituaries. Bring back Ben Wright and Peter Allis!!
Reply
EGule wrote on: Jun 8, 2005
I actually like both Nantz and Miller. I realize they have distinctly different styles, but there is a place for both.
Miller is the spice since he is a veteran with an opinion. He is right and wrong, but we expect it. I want him to comment on what is going on between the ropes.
Nantz is the storyteller, he sums it all up. He is not there to broadcast WWF. He provides proper respect to sponsors, players and viewers. We want him to pull it all together, Miller on the other hand, is free to pick it all apart.
What is sad is when Lanny Wadkins is to provide some counterpoint to Nantz and we don't get it. Maybe Lanny still feels obliged to lay off a bit, but still feel he holds back too much. Come on Lanny start competing for my attention in the booth!
Reply
Clive Scarff wrote on: Jun 7, 2005
Just to clarify, putts do move right to left (and left to right). A putt that breaks left, must be hit out to the right first, before it can move left. Therefore, right to left. If it is to go in that is! A "straight to left putt" would be one that was misread as straight, and moved left - inevitably missing the "golf hole" :).
Reply