|
 |
|
|
|
 |
| Price per hole |
October 10, 2006, 11:36 pm |
by Michel
What about paying full fare when a course is being renovated or reseeded. The price per hole should be halved or the cart fees dropped or then again a free round at one of their sister courses !
Tigers Paw did this to us last year 1st week of November. I think the clubs should be more considerate as one thing is for sure I didn't leave with anything but mud on my shirt from my divots. I would have preferred a good memory of thier signature hole.
|
 |
|
|
| price-per-hole |
June 20, 2006, 3:27 pm |
by Kiel Christianson
Well said, Tim! I've been using the price-per-hole criterion since I started reviewing courses. $18 = $1 per hole. $180 = $10 per hole. In my experience, only the most pathetic goat tracks aren't worth a buck a hole; and there are many quite pleasant courses that charge even less than that. However, it is only the very best that justify $10 per hole. In my experience, most that charge this much are not worth it more than once, if even that. Especially if they're new "resort" courses trading on luxuries and a big-name designer rather than quality golf.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: |
June 20, 2006, 11:06 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ocean vs. #2 |
June 20, 2006, 11:06 am |
by Spencer Hux
I couldn't agree more on your comments about Ocean Course and Pinehurst 2. I can't justify spending that much money at Pinehurst for second time, but I wouldn't hesitate to spend that at Ocean every now and again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
